What was Jonathan Van Ness’ response to the “Armchair Expert” podcast’s Trans Rights Episode?

If you’re into podcasts, you’re probably familiar with what an edit is. It’s that moment when something is cut out or altered in the final version of the episode. Well, Jonathan Van Ness recently opened up about a particular edit on the “Armchair Expert” podcast that delved into trans rights. And let me tell you, they weren’t too happy about it.

In a casual and candid tone, Van Ness expressed their frustration over not being consulted about the edit. They requested approval or some sort of insight, but were left in the dark. This left them feeling unheard and disrespected.


The “Armchair Expert” episode in question was centered around trans rights, a topic that is incredibly important and deserves careful consideration. Van Ness, being a prominent figure in the LGBTQ+ community, undoubtedly had valuable insights to share. However, it seems that their voice was ultimately silenced in the final cut.

It’s worth noting that podcasts, like any form of media, go through editing processes. Sometimes, certain parts are cut out to streamline the conversation or for other editorial reasons. But when it comes to discussing such a sensitive and significant issue like trans rights, it is crucial to involve all parties who can contribute to the conversation.

Data from the article titled “If you listen to podcasts, you know what an edit is — that was an edit, and that was an edit that I asked for approval or insight into, and was not given” sheds light on the magnitude of this issue. It brings to the forefront the importance of maintaining integrity and respect in podcast production. It’s not about just putting out entertaining content; it’s about fostering meaningful conversations and amplifying diverse voices.

Van Ness breaking their silence on this particular incident highlights the larger issue of representation and inclusivity in the media. By disregarding their request for approval or insight, the podcast unintentionally perpetuated a harmful narrative that marginalizes the trans community.

The omission of Van Ness’s perspective not only minimizes their lived experiences, but it also hinders the progress towards a more inclusive society. Trans rights are human rights, and it is crucial that all individuals, regardless of their gender identity, have a platform to share their stories and advocate for change. Failure to do so only perpetuates an oppressive system.

In light of this incident, it is essential for podcast creators and producers to consider the impact of their editing decisions. Communication and collaboration with individuals from marginalized communities is vital to ensure that their voices are not silenced or overlooked.

Moreover, it is crucial to create an environment where feedback and input are valued. By actively seeking approval or insight from guests, podcast hosts demonstrate respect for their experiences and identity. It is a step towards dismantling the barriers that contribute to the erasure and invisibility of marginalized voices.

The situation involving Jonathan Van Ness and the “Armchair Expert” podcast serves as a wake-up call for the podcast industry as a whole. It emphasizes the pressing need for all media platforms to be more inclusive and mindful of the narratives they perpetuate.

As listeners, we can also play a role in demanding greater accountability. Supporting podcasts that prioritize inclusivity and amplify diverse voices is a way to contribute to positive change. By actively engaging with content that promotes understanding, empathy, and equality, we can help create a more equitable media T

The incident surrounding Jonathan Van Ness’s exclusion from the “Armchair Expert” podcast episode on trans rights brings to light the need for better representation and respect in podcast production. Their request for approval or insight was disregarded, ultimately silencing their valuable perspective. This serves as a reminder for the industry as a whole to be more inclusive and considerate in their editing decisions. By actively supporting content that elevates marginalized voices, we can contribute to a more equitable media landscape.

Share this article: