The infamous film Triangle of Sadness recently had viewers scratching their heads over its stomach-churning extended vomit sequences. As audiences watched in a mix of awe and disgust, questions arose about how exactly these scenes were filmed. Were tubes used to refill the vomit for each release? Was CGI vomit involved? Or were the tubes simply edited out in post-production? Let’s delve into the intriguing mechanisms behind these vomit-inducing moments.
In most films, the use of a tube is relatively easy to spot due to the angle of the shot or the initial presence of fake vomit in the actor’s mouth before they release it on camera. However, Triangle of Sadness surprised audiences with multiple scenes featuring characters vomiting, complete with dialogue in between, followed by more vomiting – all without any camera cuts or angles that could hide a tube. This unconventional approach left viewers guessing about the methods employed.
One possibility, though it may seem bizarre, is the existence of tubes that go into the mouth to “refill” the vomit for subsequent releases. This could allow actors to vomit multiple times within a single shot without the need for any cuts or camera tricks. While this may sound far-fetched, the film industry is known for its ability to innovate and find unique ways to capture scenes, even those as stomach-turning as prolonged vomiting.
Another theory suggests the use of practical effects over CGI vomit. The vomit seen in Triangle of Sadness has a realistic appearance, indicating that computer-generated imagery may not have played a significant role in these sequences. If this is the case, it raises the question of how the actors managed to vomit so convincingly without the assistance of tubes or other devices.
Alternatively, it’s possible that the film’s production team employed clever editing techniques to remove any evidence of tubes in post-production. The seamless nature of the shots, particularly in the scene involving an older lady who vomits twice, talks, takes a drink, and vomits again in a single continuous shot, suggests meticulous editing work. By skillfully cutting and splicing footage, the filmmakers could have masked any signs of tubes or other mechanisms.
While it may seem peculiar to focus on the mechanics behind these vomit scenes, understanding the filmmaking techniques can provide some reprieve from the unsettling nature of these sequences. By considering the technical aspects with a casual tone, viewers can distract themselves from the intensity of the on-screen vomit-fest and appreciate the artistry and creativity behind the filmmaking process.
In the end, the methods employed in capturing Triangle of Sadness’ extended vomit sequences remain open to speculation. Whether it involved the use of tubes, practical effects, CGI, or meticulous editing, the film undoubtedly pushed the boundaries of audience discomfort and evoked both fascination and repulsion. As viewers, we can only admire the dedication and ingenuity of the filmmakers in bringing such visceral and memorable moments to the screen.
