Does Robin Williams’ daughter find the use of AI to recreate his voice disturbing?

Zelda Williams, daughter of the late actor Robin Williams, has expressed her concerns about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to recreate her father’s voice. In a statement posted on her Instagram Stories, Zelda called the technology “disturbing” and emphasized the importance of actors being able to give their consent to such uses.

Zelda acknowledged that she may not be an impartial voice in the Screen Actors Guild’s (SAG) fight against AI, as she has seen firsthand how people have attempted to use AI to recreate her father’s voice without his consent. She stressed that this issue is not hypothetical but a very real concern in the industry.

The main reason why the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and SAG-AFTRA went on strike was to seek protection from AI. While the WGA has ended their strike and reached a deal with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), SAG-AFTRA is set to resume negotiations with studios next week.

Zelda further elaborated on her views regarding AI, describing the recreations as, at best, poor imitations of greater actors and, at worst, monstrous creations that undermine the essence of the entertainment industry. She emphasized the importance of allowing living actors to create characters through their personal choices and to invest their human effort and time into their performances.

The use of AI to recreate voices and faces has become increasingly prevalent in recent years, with technology advancing at a rapid pace. However, the ethical implications of such technology remain a topic of heated debate. Many argue that AI should not be used to replicate the voices of deceased actors or any individuals who have not given their consent to be recreated.

Supporters of AI voice and face replication argue that the technology offers new opportunities in the entertainment industry, allowing filmmakers to bring back beloved characters and actors who have passed away. They believe that as long as proper authorization and permissions are obtained, AI can enhance filmmaking and provide audiences with a sense of nostalgia.

However, critics like Zelda Williams raise valid concerns about consent, creative freedom, and the potential devaluation of living actors’ work. They argue that AI recreations can never fully capture the essence and nuances of the original performer, reducing their artistic contributions to mere algorithms and data points.

The debate surrounding AI in the entertainment industry is intensifying, and it is clear that there are no easy answers. As technology continues to advance, it is crucial for industry stakeholders to engage in thoughtful discussions and establish ethical guidelines to navigate the complex terrain of AI use in voice and face replication.

Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance between technological advancements and respect for the creative process, ensuring that actors’ voices and choices continue to shape and define the characters we love.

Share this article: